Jump to content

Zarathustra: Difference between revisions

image
(added images)
(image)
Line 16: Line 16:
Mary Boyce, Emeritus Professor of Iranian Studies at the University of London, points out:
Mary Boyce, Emeritus Professor of Iranian Studies at the University of London, points out:


<blockquote>Zoroastrianism is the oldest of the revealed world-religions, and it has probably had more influence on mankind, directly and indirectly, than any other single faith.<ref>Mary Boyce, ''Zoroastrians, Their Religious Beliefs and Practices'' (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 1.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Zoroastrianism is the oldest of the revealed world-religions, and it has probably had more influence on mankind, directly and indirectly, than any other single faith.<ref>Mary Boyce, ''Zoroastrians, Their Religious Beliefs and Practices'' (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 1.</ref></blockquote>


According to R. C. Zaehner, former Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics at Oxford University, Zarathustra was  
According to R. C. Zaehner, former Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics at Oxford University, Zarathustra was  


<blockquote>... one of the greatest religious geniuses of all time.... [He] was a prophet, or at least conceived himself to be such; he spoke to his God face to face.... [Yet] about the Prophet himself we know almost nothing that is authentic.<ref>R. C. Zaehner, “Zoroastrianism,” in ''The Concise Encyclopaedia of Living Faiths'', ed. R. C. Zaehner (1959; reprint, Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), pp. 222, 209.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>... one of the greatest religious geniuses of all time.... [He] was a prophet, or at least conceived himself to be such; he spoke to his God face to face.... [Yet] about the Prophet himself we know almost nothing that is authentic.<ref>R. C. Zaehner, “Zoroastrianism,” in ''The Concise Encyclopaedia of Living Faiths'', ed. R. C. Zaehner (1959; reprint, Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), pp. 222, 209.</ref></blockquote>


Zarathustra lived in a nonliterate society, whose people did not keep records. His teachings were passed down by oral tradition, and much of what was later written down about his life and teachings has been lost or destroyed. What scholars have been able to piece together about him comes from three sources: the study of the historical milieu prior to and during the time Zarathustra is believed to have lived, tradition, and seventeen sacred hymns called Gathas. Scholars concur that Zarathustra composed these hymns. The Gathas are recorded in the Avesta, the sacred scriptures of Zoroastrianism.  
Zarathustra lived in a nonliterate society, whose people did not keep records. His teachings were passed down by oral tradition, and much of what was later written down about his life and teachings has been lost or destroyed. What scholars have been able to piece together about him comes from three sources: the study of the historical milieu prior to and during the time Zarathustra is believed to have lived, tradition, and seventeen sacred hymns called Gathas. Scholars concur that Zarathustra composed these hymns. The Gathas are recorded in the Avesta, the sacred scriptures of Zoroastrianism.
 
[[File:Zoroaster_1.jpg|thumb|Scenes from the life of Zarathustra]]


<!--T:6-->
<!--T:6-->
Line 35: Line 37:
The Gathas say that Zarathustra was of the Spitama family, a family of knights. The Greek name for Zarathustra is Zoroaster, meaning “Golden Star,” or “Golden Light.” He was one of the priest class who formulated mantras.
The Gathas say that Zarathustra was of the Spitama family, a family of knights. The Greek name for Zarathustra is Zoroaster, meaning “Golden Star,” or “Golden Light.” He was one of the priest class who formulated mantras.


Zarathustra was also an initiate. According to Boyce, “He ... describes himself [in the Gathas] as a ‘vaedemna’ or ‘one who knows,’ an initiate possessed of divinely inspired wisdom.”<ref>Boyce, ''Zoroastrians'', p. 19.</ref> But first and foremost, Zarathustra was a prophet, and ''he is'' a prophet and he lives today among us as an ascended master.
Zarathustra was also an initiate. According to Boyce, “He ... describes himself [in the Gathas] as a ‘vaedemna’ or ‘one who knows,’ an initiate possessed of divinely inspired wisdom.”<ref>Boyce, ''Zoroastrians'', p. 19.</ref> But first and foremost, Zarathustra was a prophet, and ''he is'' a prophet and he lives today among us as an ascended master.


The Gathas depict him as talking to God. They say:  
The Gathas depict him as talking to God. They say:  
Line 57: Line 59:
Ahura Mazda means “Wise Lord.” Zarathustra recognized Ahura Mazda as the one true God, the Creator of the universe.  
Ahura Mazda means “Wise Lord.” Zarathustra recognized Ahura Mazda as the one true God, the Creator of the universe.  


The significance of this cannot be overstated. Zarathustra may have been the first monotheist in recorded history. Zaehner points out, “The great achievement of the Iranian Prophet [was] that he eliminated all the ancient gods of the Iranian pantheon, leaving only Ahura Mazdah, the ‘Wise Lord’, as the One True God.”<ref>Zaehner, “Zoroastrianism,” p. 210.</ref>
The significance of this cannot be overstated. Zarathustra may have been the first monotheist in recorded history. Zaehner points out, “The great achievement of the Iranian Prophet [was] that he eliminated all the ancient gods of the Iranian pantheon, leaving only Ahura Mazdah, the ‘Wise Lord’, as the One True God.”<ref>Zaehner, “Zoroastrianism,” p. 210.</ref>


Some scholars assert that Zarathustra was not a strict monotheist but a henotheist, that is, one who worships one God but does not deny the existence of others. This is a technical distinction. As David Bradley, author of ''A Guide to the World’s Religions'', notes, “[Zarathustra] was a practicing monotheist in the same way that Moses was.”<ref>David G. Bradley, ''A Guide to the World’s Religions'' (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 40.</ref> Bradley thinks that Moses knew of the existence of lesser gods but insisted on the necessity of siding with the true God against all other gods.<ref>Ibid.</ref>
Some scholars assert that Zarathustra was not a strict monotheist but a henotheist, that is, one who worships one God but does not deny the existence of others. This is a technical distinction. As David Bradley, author of ''A Guide to the World’s Religions'', notes, “[Zarathustra] was a practicing monotheist in the same way that Moses was.”<ref>David G. Bradley, ''A Guide to the World’s Religions'' (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 40.</ref> Bradley thinks that Moses knew of the existence of lesser gods but insisted on the necessity of siding with the true God against all other gods.<ref>Ibid.</ref>
Line 84: Line 86:


<!--T:11-->
<!--T:11-->
After two long years, the monarch was finally converted. But Vishtaspa required one final sign before he would totally embrace the faith. He asked to be shown what role he would play in the heaven-world. In response, Ahura Mazda sent three archangels to the court of Vishtaspa and Hutaosa. They appeared as effulgent knights in full armour, riding on horseback. According to one text, they arrived in such glory that “their radiance in that lofty residence seemed ... a heaven of complete light, owing to their great power and triumph;... when he thus looked upon [them], the exalted king Vishtaspa trembled, all his courtiers trembled, all his chieftains were confused.”<ref>Dinkart 7.4.75–76, quoted in Bernard H. Springett, ''Zoroaster, the Great Teacher'' (London: William Rider and Son, 1923), p. 25.</ref>
After two long years, the monarch was finally converted. But Vishtaspa required one final sign before he would totally embrace the faith. He asked to be shown what role he would play in the heaven-world. In response, Ahura Mazda sent three archangels to the court of Vishtaspa and Hutaosa. They appeared as effulgent knights in full armour, riding on horseback. According to one text, they arrived in such glory that “their radiance in that lofty residence seemed ... a heaven of complete light, owing to their great power and triumph;... when he thus looked upon [them], the exalted king Vishtaspa trembled, all his courtiers trembled, all his chieftains were confused.”<ref>Dinkart 7.4.75–76, quoted in Bernard H. Springett, ''Zoroaster, the Great Teacher'' (London: William Rider and Son, 1923), p. 25.</ref>


<!--T:12-->
<!--T:12-->
Line 109: Line 111:
Zarathustra recognized Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord, as the creator of all, but he did not see him as a solitary figure. In Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the father of Spenta Mainyu, the Holy Spirit. ''Spenta'' means “holy” or “bountiful.” ''Mainyu'' means “spirit” or “mentality.” The Holy Spirit is one with, yet distinct from, Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda expresses his will through Spenta Mainyu.
Zarathustra recognized Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord, as the creator of all, but he did not see him as a solitary figure. In Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the father of Spenta Mainyu, the Holy Spirit. ''Spenta'' means “holy” or “bountiful.” ''Mainyu'' means “spirit” or “mentality.” The Holy Spirit is one with, yet distinct from, Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda expresses his will through Spenta Mainyu.


Boyce explains:
Boyce explains:


<blockquote>For Zarathushtra God was Ahura Mazda, who ... had created the world and all that is good in it through his Holy Spirit, Spenta Mainyu, who is both his active agent and yet one with him, indivisible and yet distinct.<ref>Mary Boyce, ed. and trans., ''Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism'' (1984; reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. 12.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>For Zarathushtra God was Ahura Mazda, who ... had created the world and all that is good in it through his Holy Spirit, Spenta Mainyu, who is both his active agent and yet one with him, indivisible and yet distinct.<ref>Mary Boyce, ed. and trans., ''Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism'' (1984; reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. 12.</ref></blockquote>
Line 125: Line 127:
The six Holy or Bountiful Immortals also represent attributes of Ahura Mazda. The Holy Immortals are as follows:
The six Holy or Bountiful Immortals also represent attributes of Ahura Mazda. The Holy Immortals are as follows:


'''Vohu Manah''', whose name means “Good Mind,” “Good Thought” or “Good Purpose.” According to Boyce, “For every individual, as for the prophet himself,” Vohu Manah is “the Immortal who leads the way to all the rest.” '''Asha Vahishta''', whose name means “Best Righteousness,” “Truth” or “Order,” is the closest confederate of Vohu Manah.<ref>Ibid., p. 22; Boyce, ''Textual Sources'', p. 13.</ref>
'''Vohu Manah''', whose name means “Good Mind,” “Good Thought” or “Good Purpose.” According to Boyce, “For every individual, as for the prophet himself,” Vohu Manah is “the Immortal who leads the way to all the rest.” '''Asha Vahishta''', whose name means “Best Righteousness,” “Truth” or “Order,” is the closest confederate of Vohu Manah.<ref>Ibid., p. 22; Boyce, ''Textual Sources'', p. 13.</ref>


'''Spenta Armaiti''', “Right-mindedness” or “Holy Devotion,” Boyce says, embodies the dedication to what is good and just. '''Khshathra Vairya''', “Desirable Dominion,” represents the power that each person should exert for righteousness as well as the power and the kingdom of God.<ref>Boyce, ''Zoroastrians'', p. 22.</ref>
'''Spenta Armaiti''', “Right-mindedness” or “Holy Devotion,” Boyce says, embodies the dedication to what is good and just. '''Khshathra Vairya''', “Desirable Dominion,” represents the power that each person should exert for righteousness as well as the power and the kingdom of God.<ref>Boyce, ''Zoroastrians'', p. 22.</ref>
Line 151: Line 153:
<blockquote>Between the two the ''daevas'' [the demons] did not choose rightly; for, as they deliberated, delusion overcame them so that they chose the most Evil Mind. Then did they, with one accord, rush headlong unto Fury that they might thereby extinguish the existence of mortal men.<ref>Ibid.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Between the two the ''daevas'' [the demons] did not choose rightly; for, as they deliberated, delusion overcame them so that they chose the most Evil Mind. Then did they, with one accord, rush headlong unto Fury that they might thereby extinguish the existence of mortal men.<ref>Ibid.</ref></blockquote>


The Holy Spirit and the Evil Spirit are, as Zaehner puts it, “irreconcilably opposed to each other.”<ref>Zaehner, ''Dawn'', pp. 42–43.</ref>Zarathustra said:  
The Holy Spirit and the Evil Spirit are, as Zaehner puts it, “irreconcilably opposed to each other.”<ref>Zaehner, ''Dawn'', pp. 42–43.</ref> Zarathustra said:  


<blockquote>I will speak out concerning the two Spirits of whom, at the beginning of existence, the Holier thus spoke to him who is Evil: “Neither our thoughts, nor our teachings, nor our wills, nor our choices, nor our words, nor our deeds, nor our consciences, nor yet our souls agree.”<ref>Gatha: Yasna 45.2, quoted in Zaehner, ''Dawn'', p. 43.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>I will speak out concerning the two Spirits of whom, at the beginning of existence, the Holier thus spoke to him who is Evil: “Neither our thoughts, nor our teachings, nor our wills, nor our choices, nor our words, nor our deeds, nor our consciences, nor yet our souls agree.”<ref>Gatha: Yasna 45.2, quoted in Zaehner, ''Dawn'', p. 43.</ref></blockquote>
Line 198: Line 200:


<blockquote>Fire, the great object of reverence of Zoroaster’s disciples,... has ever been looked upon as a symbol of Spirit, and of Deity, representing the ever-living and ever-active light—essence of the Supreme Being. The perpetual preservation of fire is the first of the five things consecrated by Zoroaster.... The perpetual preservation of fire typifies the essential truth that every man should in like manner make it his constant object to preserve the divine principle in himself which it symbolises.<ref>Springett, ''Zoroaster'', p. 60.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Fire, the great object of reverence of Zoroaster’s disciples,... has ever been looked upon as a symbol of Spirit, and of Deity, representing the ever-living and ever-active light—essence of the Supreme Being. The perpetual preservation of fire is the first of the five things consecrated by Zoroaster.... The perpetual preservation of fire typifies the essential truth that every man should in like manner make it his constant object to preserve the divine principle in himself which it symbolises.<ref>Springett, ''Zoroaster'', p. 60.</ref></blockquote>
[[File:1280px-Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 Iran - Yazd - Atash Behram-1.jpg|thumb|Fire Temple of Yazd, Iran. This Zoroastrian temple was built in 1934. The sacred fire of the temple is stated to have been burning since about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 470.]]


== Legacy == <!--T:18-->
== Legacy == <!--T:18-->
Line 217: Line 217:
<!--T:21-->
<!--T:21-->
About <small>A</small>.<small>D.</small> 225, Zoroastrianism reemerged in Persia and was the state religion until around 651, when the Muslims conquered Persia. Although Zoroastrianism was officially tolerated, the Arab conquerors encouraged conversion to Islam through societal pressures, economic incentives or force. Many Zoroastrians converted or went into exile. Loyal Zoroastrians who remained in Persia were taxed for the privilege of practicing their faith. In later centuries, persecution of Zoroastrians escalated. As of 1976, there were only 129,000 Zoroastrians in the world.<ref>Ibid., p. 226.</ref>
About <small>A</small>.<small>D.</small> 225, Zoroastrianism reemerged in Persia and was the state religion until around 651, when the Muslims conquered Persia. Although Zoroastrianism was officially tolerated, the Arab conquerors encouraged conversion to Islam through societal pressures, economic incentives or force. Many Zoroastrians converted or went into exile. Loyal Zoroastrians who remained in Persia were taxed for the privilege of practicing their faith. In later centuries, persecution of Zoroastrians escalated. As of 1976, there were only 129,000 Zoroastrians in the world.<ref>Ibid., p. 226.</ref>
[[File:1280px-Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 Iran - Yazd - Atash Behram-1.jpg|thumb|Fire Temple of Yazd, Iran. This Zoroastrian temple was built in 1934. The sacred fire of the temple is stated to have been burning since about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 470.]]


According to Zaehner:
According to Zaehner: