Jump to content

Joseph of Arimathea: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Pietro Perugino cat40.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|''Lamentation over the Dead Christ'', Pietro Perugino (1495), showing Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea (right) tending the body of Jesus]]
== The Biblical account ==
== The Biblical account ==


Line 8: Line 10:


However, beyond the Biblical account, the myths, legends, and traditions of Joseph are many and widespread.
However, beyond the Biblical account, the myths, legends, and traditions of Joseph are many and widespread.
[[File:Pietro Perugino 012.jpg|thumb|upright|''Lamentation over the Dead Christ'', detail showing Joseph of Arimathea]]


== Relationship with Jesus ==
== Relationship with Jesus ==
Line 131: Line 135:
<blockquote>The merchants transport the tin they buy of the inhabitants to France; and for thirty days journey, they transport it on horses’ backs through France, to the mouth of the river Rhone.<ref>Ibid., p. 311.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>The merchants transport the tin they buy of the inhabitants to France; and for thirty days journey, they transport it on horses’ backs through France, to the mouth of the river Rhone.<ref>Ibid., p. 311.</ref></blockquote>


Joseph could have even been more than a merchant—a Roman official in the trade. Gildas the Wise, a British monk who lived <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. c. 500–570, refers to him as “nobilis decurio.”<ref>''De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae'', a religious polemic by Gildas, is the only existing written source for the early Christian history of Britain written close to that time.<ref> According to Capt, the title “‘decurio’ denoted an important Roman office, usually connected with the general management of a mining district. The implication is that Joseph was a provincial ... Roman Senator and in charge of Rome’s mining interests in Britain.”<ref>Capt, ''Traditions of Glastonbury'', p. 22.</ref>
Joseph could have even been more than a merchant—a Roman official in the trade. Gildas the Wise, a British monk who lived <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. c. 500–570, refers to him as “nobilis decurio.”<ref>''De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae'', a religious polemic by Gildas, is the only existing written source for the early Christian history of Britain written close to that time. The complete text is available at [http://www.gutenberg.org Project Gutenberg].</ref> According to Capt, the title “‘decurio’ denoted an important Roman office, usually connected with the general management of a mining district. The implication is that Joseph was a provincial ... Roman Senator and in charge of Rome’s mining interests in Britain.”<ref>Capt, ''Traditions of Glastonbury'', p. 22.</ref>


The traditions of Joseph in Cornwall and the mining districts do not point to any permanent resting place. The weight of evidence says his ministry was in Glastonbury, site of an ancient Christian abbey, home of Grail legends and, incidentally, only twelve miles from the site some archaeologists favor as Arthur’s castle—Cadbury.
The traditions of Joseph in Cornwall and the mining districts do not point to any permanent resting place. The weight of evidence says his ministry was in Glastonbury, site of an ancient Christian abbey, home of Grail legends and, incidentally, only twelve miles from the site some archaeologists favor as Arthur’s castle—Cadbury.
Line 179: Line 183:
While these sources provide evidence of a Christian church in Britain at an early date, there is one problem with the evidence regarding Joseph of Arimathea. The only extant manuscripts that point definitely to Joseph as the Christianizer were written over a thousand years after the event they record. Their sources have vanished perhaps in part because of a reign of terror begun in <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 303 by Diocletian, emperor of Rome. It is described in the following paragraph from Gildas:
While these sources provide evidence of a Christian church in Britain at an early date, there is one problem with the evidence regarding Joseph of Arimathea. The only extant manuscripts that point definitely to Joseph as the Christianizer were written over a thousand years after the event they record. Their sources have vanished perhaps in part because of a reign of terror begun in <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 303 by Diocletian, emperor of Rome. It is described in the following paragraph from Gildas:


<blockquote>[During] the nine years’ persecution by the tyrant Diocletian,... the Churches throughout the whole world were overthrown. All the copies of the Holy Scriptures which could be found were burned in the streets, and the chosen pastors of God’s flock butchered, together with their innocent sheep, in order that (if possible) not a vestige might remain in some provinces of Christ’s religion.</blockquote>
<blockquote>[During] the nine years’ persecution by the tyrant Diocletian,... the Churches throughout the whole world were overthrown. All the copies of the Holy Scriptures which could be found were burned in the streets, and the chosen pastors of God’s flock butchered, together with their innocent sheep, in order that (if possible) not a vestige might remain in some provinces of Christ’s religion.<ref>Gildas, ''De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae'', section 9.</ref></blockquote>


This persecution, which according to one source killed 889 communicants in Britain, could easily have destroyed all written record of Joseph, leaving him alone in the memories of the Britons.
This persecution, which according to one source killed 889 communicants in Britain, could easily have destroyed all written record of Joseph, leaving him alone in the memories of the Britons.
Line 189: Line 193:
Cressy continues:
Cressy continues:


<blockquote>Now the most eminent of the primitive disciples ... was St. Joseph of Arimathea, and eleven of his companions with him, among whom is reckoned his son of his own name. These toward the latter end of Nero’s reign [it ended about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 68], and before St. Peter and St. Paul were consummated by a glorious martyrdom [about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 64 and 67], are by the testimony of ancient records said to have entered this island, as a place for the retiredness of it, the benignity to the British Princes, and the freedom from Roman tyranny, more, opportune, and better prepared for entertaining the Gospel of Peace, than almost any country, under the Romans.<ref>Capt, ''Traditions of Glastonbury'', p. 22.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Now the most eminent of the primitive disciples ... was St. Joseph of Arimathea, and eleven of his companions with him, among whom is reckoned his son of his own name. These toward the latter end of Nero’s reign [it ended about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 68], and before St. Peter and St. Paul were consummated by a glorious martyrdom [about <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 64 and 67], are by the testimony of ancient records said to have entered this island, as a place for the retiredness of it, the benignity to the British Princes, and the freedom from Roman tyranny, more, opportune, and better prepared for entertaining the Gospel of Peace, than almost any country, under the Romans.<ref>Hugh Paulinus de Cressy, ''The Church History of Brittanny or England, from the beginning of Christianity to the Norman Conquest'' (1668), quoted in Capt, ''Traditions of Glastonbury'', p. 22.</ref></blockquote>


Polydore Vergil, the sixteenth-century Italian historian who traveled to Britain and published an accurate history of England entitled ''Anglicae Historiae Libri'', wrote:
Polydore Vergil, the sixteenth-century Italian historian who traveled to Britain and published an accurate history of England entitled ''Anglicae Historiae Libri'', wrote:


<blockquote>Britain, partly [because of] Joseph of Arimathea,... was of all kingdoms, first, that received the Gospel.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Britain, partly [because of] Joseph of Arimathea,... was of all kingdoms, first, that received the Gospel.<ref>Lewis, ''Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonbury'', p. 15.</ref></blockquote>


=== William of Malmesbury ===
=== William of Malmesbury ===


De Antiquitate Glastonie Ecclesie was written by famous historian William of Malmesbury about 1135. He said he based it on “the writing of the ancients,” found in the Glastonbury library before it was destroyed. His chronicle says that St. Philip
''De Antiquitate Glastonie Ecclesie'' was written by famous historian William of Malmesbury about 1135. He said he based it on “the writing of the ancients,” found in the Glastonbury library before it was destroyed. His chronicle says that St. Philip


<blockquote>... sent twelve of his disciples into Britain to teach the word of life. It is said that he appointed as their leader his very dear friend, Joseph of Arimathea, who had buried the Lord. They came to Britain in 63 AD, the fifteenth year after the assumption of the blessed Mary, and confidently began to preach the faith of Christ. The barbarian king and his people, hearing this new and unfamiliar preaching, refused absolutely to agree with it and would not alter the teachings of their forefathers; yet because they had come from afar, and because the sobriety of their life demanded it of him, the king granted them a certain island on the outskirts of his territory on which they could live, a place surrounded by woods, bramble bushes and marshes and called by its inhabitants Yniswitrin.</blockquote>
<blockquote>... sent twelve of his disciples into Britain to teach the word of life. It is said that he appointed as their leader his very dear friend, Joseph of Arimathea, who had buried the Lord. They came to Britain in 63 AD, the fifteenth year after the assumption of the blessed Mary, and confidently began to preach the faith of Christ. The barbarian king and his people, hearing this new and unfamiliar preaching, refused absolutely to agree with it and would not alter the teachings of their forefathers; yet because they had come from afar, and because the sobriety of their life demanded it of him, the king granted them a certain island on the outskirts of his territory on which they could live, a place surrounded by woods, bramble bushes and marshes and called by its inhabitants Yniswitrin.<ref>John Scott, ed., ''The Early History of Glastonbury: An Edition, Translation, and Study of William of Malmesbury’s De Antiquitate Glastonie Ecclesie'' (Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell Press, 1981).</ref></blockquote>


Although William of Malmesbury is considered a reliable historian, quite a bit of scholarly dispute has raged over this and other passages of his work relating to Joseph. Most historians agree that the mention of a Joseph was a later interpolation by the Glastonbury monks. However, they differ on the monks’ motive.
Although William of Malmesbury is considered a reliable historian, quite a bit of scholarly dispute has raged over this and other passages of his work relating to Joseph. Most historians agree that the mention of a Joseph was a later interpolation by the Glastonbury monks. However, they differ on the monks’ motive.


John Scott, editor of a William of Malmesbury translation, says that the monks were trying to enhance the prestige of their monastery by establishing an “ancient foundation and a saintly founder.” So they “boldly expanded William’s sober and guarded account. They gave names to the missionaries, who had been unknown to William, and invented a document in which Phagan and Deruvian [missionaries sent by Roman Church hierarch Elutherins in <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 166] recounted the story of the foundation of Glastonbury by the disciples of St. Philip. An even later embellishment ... brought Joseph of Arimathea to Glastonbury as the leader of the missionaries.”  
John Scott, editor of a William of Malmesbury translation, says that the monks were trying to enhance the prestige of their monastery by establishing an “ancient foundation and a saintly founder.” So they “boldly expanded William’s sober and guarded account. They gave names to the missionaries, who had been unknown to William, and invented a document in which Phagan and Deruvian [missionaries sent by Roman Church hierarch Elutherins in <small>A</small>.<small>D</small>. 166] recounted the story of the foundation of Glastonbury by the disciples of St. Philip. An even later embellishment ... brought Joseph of Arimathea to Glastonbury as the leader of the missionaries.”<Ibid.</ref>


However, not all scholars agree with this interpretation. Geoffrey Ashe says that an interpolation does not preclude the veracity of the statement. He wrote:
However, not all scholars agree with this interpretation. Geoffrey Ashe says that an interpolation does not preclude the veracity of the statement. He wrote:


<blockquote>In the upshot I see no reason to doubt that by 1190 a Celtic Joseph legend, preserved in Wales, had returned to the Abbey, and that this was the common source for [Grail romancer] Robert de Borron and the ''De Antiquitate interpolator''.</blockquote>
<blockquote>In the upshot I see no reason to doubt that by 1190 a Celtic Joseph legend, preserved in Wales, had returned to the Abbey, and that this was the common source for [Grail romancer] Robert de Borron and the ''De Antiquitate interpolator''.<ref>Ashe, ''Quest for Arthur’s Britain''.</ref></blockquote>


If the passage about Joseph is indeed a forgery, a more reliable passage admits the early Christian settlement of Glastonbury, but leaves the settlers unnamed. William of Malmesbury wrote that “there are also letters worthy of belief to be found at St. Edmund’s to this effect: ‘the hands of other men did not make the church at Glastonbury, but the very disciples of Christ, namely those sent by St. Philip the apostle, built it.’”
If the passage about Joseph is indeed a forgery, a more reliable passage admits the early Christian settlement of Glastonbury, but leaves the settlers unnamed. William of Malmesbury wrote that “there are also letters worthy of belief to be found at St. Edmund’s to this effect: ‘the hands of other men did not make the church at Glastonbury, but the very disciples of Christ, namely those sent by St. Philip the apostle, built it.’”
Line 219: Line 223:
::And did those feet in ancient time<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Walk upon England’s mountains green:<br/>And was the holy Lamb of God,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;On England’s pleasant pastures seen!  
::And did those feet in ancient time<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Walk upon England’s mountains green:<br/>And was the holy Lamb of God,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;On England’s pleasant pastures seen!  


::And did the Countenance Divine,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Shine forth upon our clouded hills?<br/>And was Jerusalem builded here,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Among these dark Satanic Mills?  
::And did the Countenance Divine,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Shine forth upon our clouded hills?<br/>And was Jerusalem builded here,<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Among these dark Satanic Mills?<ref>William Blake, “And did those feet in ancient time.”</ref>


In a pamphlet, ''Did Our Lord Visit Britain As They Say in Cornwall and Somerset?'', Reverend C. C. Dobson, M.A., recounts four separate and independent traditions that say Jesus came to Britain.
In a pamphlet, ''Did Our Lord Visit Britain As They Say in Cornwall and Somerset?'', Reverend C. C. Dobson, M.A., recounts four separate and independent traditions that say Jesus came to Britain.


The first of these is found in Cornwall. In his Book of Cornwall, Baring-Gould reports a “Cornish story ... to the effect that Joseph of Arimathea came in a boat to Cornwall, and brought the Child Jesus with him, and the latter taught him how to extract the tin and purge it of its [ore] wolfram[ite].... When the tin is flashed then the tinner shouts, ‘Joseph was in the tin trade.’”  
The first of these is found in Cornwall. In his ''Book of Cornwall'', Baring-Gould reports a “Cornish story ... to the effect that Joseph of Arimathea came in a boat to Cornwall, and brought the Child Jesus with him, and the latter taught him how to extract the tin and purge it of its [ore] wolfram[ite].... When the tin is flashed then the tinner shouts, ‘Joseph was in the tin trade.’”<ref>S. Baring-Gould, ''Book of Cornwall'' (London: Methuen & Co., 1899, 1906), p. 57.</ref>


The second is a Somerset County tradition describing how Jesus and Joseph came to Summerland on a ship from Tarshish and stayed in Paradise (a place name for areas around Burnham and Glastonbury).  
The second is a Somerset County tradition describing how Jesus and Joseph came to Summerland on a ship from Tarshish and stayed in Paradise (a place name for areas around Burnham and Glastonbury).<ref>Dobson, ''Did Our Lord Visit Britain As They Say in Cornwall and Somerset?''</ref>


The third says that Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea stayed in the mining village of Priddy, north of Glastonbury, in the Mendip Hills of Somerset County.  An old saying there is:  “As sure as Our Lord was at Priddy...”  
The third says that Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea stayed in the mining village of Priddy, north of Glastonbury, in the Mendip Hills of Somerset County.  An old saying there is:  “As sure as Our Lord was at Priddy...”<ref>Ibid.</ref>


The fourth tradition places Jesus and Joseph in Glastonbury.
The fourth tradition places Jesus and Joseph in Glastonbury.
Line 233: Line 237:
Summarizing the beliefs, Dobson says:  
Summarizing the beliefs, Dobson says:  


<blockquote>[Joseph] gained his wealth as an importer in the tin trade, which existed between Cornwall and Phoenicia. On one of his voyages he took Our Lord with him when a boy. Our Lord either remained in Britain or returned later as a young man, and stayed in quiet retirement at Glastonbury. Here he erected for himself a small house of mud and wattle. Later Joseph of Arimathea, fleeing from Palestine, settled in the same place and erected a mud and wattle church.</blockquote>
<blockquote>[Joseph] gained his wealth as an importer in the tin trade, which existed between Cornwall and Phoenicia. On one of his voyages he took Our Lord with him when a boy. Our Lord either remained in Britain or returned later as a young man, and stayed in quiet retirement at Glastonbury. Here he erected for himself a small house of mud and wattle. Later Joseph of Arimathea, fleeing from Palestine, settled in the same place and erected a mud and wattle church.<ref>Ibid.</ref></blockquote>


The evidence that Joseph came to Glastonbury soon after the crucifixion, reviewed above, says that Joseph was in the tin trade. If so, it is likely that he went to Britain periodically and stopped at different mining centers. Thus, it is logical that each of the four traditions could be valid.
The evidence that Joseph came to Glastonbury soon after the crucifixion, reviewed above, says that Joseph was in the tin trade. If so, it is likely that he went to Britain periodically and stopped at different mining centers. Thus, it is logical that each of the four traditions could be valid.
Line 247: Line 251:
Maelgwyn even gave the location of Joseph’s burial.
Maelgwyn even gave the location of Joseph’s burial.


<blockquote>The Isle of Avalon greedy of burials ... received thousands of sleepers, among whom Joseph de Marmore from Aramathea by name, entered his perpetual sleep. And he lies in a bifurcated line next the southern angle of the oratory made of circular wattles by 13 inhabitants of the place over the powerful adorable Virgin.</blockquote>
<blockquote>The Isle of Avalon greedy of burials ... received thousands of sleepers, among whom Joseph de Marmore from Aramathea by name, entered his perpetual sleep. And he lies in a bifurcated line next the southern angle of the oratory made of circular wattles by 13 inhabitants of the place over the powerful adorable Virgin.<ref>Capt, ''Traditions of Glastonbury'', p. 51.</ref></blockquote>


A reputed sarcophagus of Joseph does exist today in Glastonbury. A fourteenth-century monk, Roget of Boston, recorded an epitaph attached to it found after it was exhumed in 1345. It read in Latin, “To the Britons I came after I buried the Christ. I taught, I have entered my rest.”  
A reputed sarcophagus of Joseph does exist today in Glastonbury. A fourteenth-century monk, Roget of Boston, recorded an epitaph attached to it found after it was exhumed in 1345. It read in Latin, “To the Britons I came after I buried the Christ. I taught, I have entered my rest.”<ref>Ibid., p. 94.</ref>


== For more information ==
== For more information ==